The Trump administration has announced the revocation of a Biden-era memo that addressed the payment of women student-athletes in higher education institutions for the use of their name, image, and likeness rights.
Opposition to NIL Guidance
Craig Trainor, the department's acting assistant secretary for civil rights, criticized the NIL guidance issued by the Biden administration, stating that it was burdensome and unfair. The administration deemed the guidance as exceeding the intended scope of agency directives.
Repercussions in College Athletics
The nine-page fact sheet released by the Department of Education during the final days of the Biden administration emphasized the non-binding nature of the guidance. However, it sparked concerns among college athletics leaders regarding Title IX compliance in light of pending antitrust lawsuits.
Schools were urged to ensure equal athletic opportunities for male and female student-athletes, particularly in the context of name, image, and likeness rights. The Biden administration's civil rights office emphasized the need for proportional financial assistance for both genders.
Contrary Viewpoints
The Trump administration rejected the notion that NIL agreements should be distributed based on gender equity under Title IX. Trainor argued that Title IX does not dictate revenue allocation in collegiate sports programs and lacks the legal foundation to mandate gender-based compensation distribution.
Legal Justification Concerns
Trainor, nominated by Trump for a role in housing and urban development, highlighted the absence of legal support for the Biden administration's stance on gender equity in student-athlete compensation. The administration's decision reflects a departure from the previous administration's stance on Title IX compliance in collegiate sports.
0 Comments