President Donald Trump's attempt to impose a blanket freeze on federal spending faced another obstacle as a federal appeals court denied the administration's emergency request to lift the restrictions.
Legal Setback for Trump Administration
The Boston-based 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision by a three-judge panel, rebuffed the administration's efforts, marking an initial defeat in a legal battle over executive powers during Trump's second term.
Current Status of the Case
The appeals court's ruling leaves the matter in the hands of U.S. District Judge John McConnell in Rhode Island. Judge McConnell had previously ordered the administration to end the broad spending freeze on federal programs, and he recently issued a stern follow-up order in response to alleged non-compliance.
This ruling adds to a series of legal setbacks for the administration, with courts nationwide blocking key Trump policies due to concerns of potential violations of laws and the Constitution.
Appeals Court's Decision
Despite the limitations on appealing temporary restraining orders like McConnell's, the Justice Department swiftly sought relief from the 1st Circuit. The appeals judges, including David Barron, Julie Rikelman, and Lara Montecalvo, declined the request for an 'administrative stay,' questioning its legal validity and necessity.
The judges highlighted the lack of evidence to support the administration's request for a stay and expressed skepticism about the urgency of the situation.
Background of the Lawsuit
The lawsuit, filed by 22 Democratic state attorneys general, initially targeted an Office of Management and Budget directive that halted grant and aid funding. Although the memo was rescinded promptly, the states argue that funding for various programs remains obstructed.
Notably, Judge McConnell and Judge Barron were appointed by President Barack Obama, while Judges Rikelman and Montecalvo were nominated by President Joe Biden.
0 Comments